Anti-immigrant racism gets academic veneer


Anti-immigrant racism gets academic veneer

Comment

Written by: CARF


A new ‘thinktank’, MigrationWatch UK, has claimed that two million foreigners will be settling in Britain.

It says much about the English newspaper industry that two men, with nothing more than a website and a set of alarmist figures about immigration to Britain, were able to set the news agenda for several days at the beginning of August, casting us back to the dangerous ‘numbers game’ of the Enoch Powell years. Migration Watch UK, a so-called ‘thinktank’ founded by Sir Andrew Green, a ‘retired diplomat’, and David Coleman, an Oxford don who has made a career out of giving governments academic backing for immigration restrictions, claimed that 2 million foreigners would be settling in Britain over the next ten years, pushing the country to crisis point.

While Coleman defended his figures, claiming to be an independent, scientific researcher striving to have an ‘open debate’ on immigration, his claims in fact give academic credibility to the kind of Daily Mail racism which holds that Britain is being ‘swamped’. As its website shows, the group’s starting assumption is that immigration is a bad thing and threatens the ‘coherence’ of the nation. The group first attempted to get media attention in May, when a figure of 1 million immigrants in five years was reported in the Sun, but the story failed to catch on. Shortly afterwards, the group increased its prediction to 2 million immigrants in ten years, but that still only got them a short mention in the Times.

It was only later in August that the Mail and Telegraph decided the story was worth pushing, and the Mail‘s front page reported ‘250,000 migrants a year entering Britain’ or, more graphically, ‘a city the size of Cambridge every six months’. Other sections of the media lamely followed suit, so that the story dominated the week’s news, as effectively as if Powell himself had risen from the dead and revisited his ‘rivers of blood’ speech. Ironically, the right-wing press – having set the entire news agenda for the country onto the question of whether ‘enough is enough’ – were still complaining by the end of it, that this was something that couldn’t be ‘openly debated’ because of an enforced silence on the issue caused by, you guessed it, political correctness.

Interesting to note then how little was mentioned of the group’s own background. Only Private Eye had the honesty to tell its readers that Andrew Green, as well as spending many years in the Diplomatic Service, including stints as ambassador to Saudi Arabia and Syria, also spent time on the board of Vickers Military Systems which makes tanks for dictatorships in the Middle East. Who better, then, to understand the forces which drive asylum seekers to flee their homes in the first place?

Related links

Amnesty International

Asylum Support

Barbed Wire Britain

Campaign Against Racism and Fascism

Committee to Defend Asylum Seekers

National Coalition of Anti-Deportation Campaigns

New Vision


The Institute of Race Relations is precluded from expressing a corporate view: any opinions expressed are therefore those of the authors.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

3 Comments
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
john
john
18 years ago

lots of emotive langauge here (as bill morris would say) little fact from either side appears in the article. a bit of a 6th form or undergraduate standard i’d say.

James
James
17 years ago

Absolutely no factual rebuttal of Andrew Green’s claims has been offered. This is a common theme on websites of this nature; lots of scoffing and sneering and complaints about hidden, racist motives, and absolutely no rational counter-argument to the articles being reported. Does the author suggest these figures have been “invented” out of thin air??

Ravi
Ravi
16 years ago

I could not agree more with your comments, there are simply just as many white immigrants as any other colour, the race card is simply being used as a weapon to hide the real truth that people claim to be real refugees but are simply from other countries they claim to live in. Many people in London can see why minority groups always use this to hide the real truth about illegal immigrants. The latest was a Brazilian (shot! WHY, If he had gone home rather than forging his passport with indefinite remain to leave stamp, he would be still alive) and the bomber in Rome in prison saying he claimed asylum in Britain under a false name and country of resident. This is how it goes for many so called asylum seekers Albanians claim to be Kosovan’s Malawi’s claim to be from Zimbabwe and it goes on, all the time we are called raciest. I am Indian and I know what goes on in my own community people turn a blind eye to illegal Indians as they feel more that come in the more power we can have as a group. I hate this abuse and prefer to talk about it around news groups like yours to let people know that they are right about many assumptions on asylum and that there are many cheats that stop real refugees from getting help.

3
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x